Let’s say a compliance platform costs $12,000 per year. Does that sound like a lot?
It’s dependent on the part you are replacing.
If technology can eliminate hundreds of hours repetitive evidence gathering in a complex technology landscape, $12,000 could be a wise investment. If a company of seven could gather the same evidence manually in a few hours each month, the figure looks considerably different.
This is a good way to approach the search for the best Vanta alternative. Asking which platform has the greatest features is not the only thing to consider. Consider what these features can save your company in actual time and energy.
The Break-Even Level for Automation
It’s not intrinsically good or evil. The value of compliance automation will change as the company expands. Imagine a technology company that is growing, with several cloud environments, a variety of applications and frequent changes to access. The strain of manually gathering evidence over time could become extremely difficult. Integrations which automatically monitor systems and gather evidence can easily justify their expense.
Take a look at a startup that has 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2. The infrastructure could be compact, and the evidence collection might be manageable with significant automation.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. The capabilities of a sophisticated platform are amazing, but they are only useful in the event that an organization requires them.
Compare Architecture Not Just Brands
A search for Vanta Vs. Drata can quickly become a feature-by -feature test. It is essential to look at the features, services, contracts and quotes of each platform. Both are well-established compliance platforms that focus on automation and integrations.
There’s a second decision to take first, however. Do you want to use an integration-driven platform for compliance in any way? Certain companies want automated evidence collection, as well as constant monitoring. Other businesses would prefer to provide evidence on their own, particularly when workload is modest.
Vanta Competitors Do Not All Utilize the same model
A number of well-known Vanta competitors compete in the same category of automation. There are also lighter platforms designed around the organization of systems rather than a large amount of connectivity.
CertAssist fits into this category. CertAssist was developed by internal auditors and compliance experts. It organizes framework controls into a central workspace. It also allows for editing of guidelines for policy as well as evidence. Auditors are able to review the documents submitted using a read-only interface.
It does not, in fact, connect to operational systems, or create infrastructure agents. Customers upload their own documents.
Factor System Access Into the Decision
It is evident that the removal of integrations will have a disadvantage. Someone must collect evidence manually.
It also removes the need for integration setup and this means that the compliance application does not require standing connection to the organisation’s operational environment.
The designs of either are not superior to each other. The relevant question is which tradeoff makes sense for your company.
CertAssist is targeted towards teams with five to 200 employees and gives pricing information rather than having to have an in-person sales meeting. Its stated launch price is $225 per month, which is compared to a standard price of $375 monthly.
Let Complexity earn its place
Today’s needs for a startup with 10 employees aren’t necessarily the same as those of companies with 100 or 500 workers.
The compliance can be maintained using a the help of a basic platform. The cost of automation could be increased as systems, employees and frameworks increase. It’s better to let the complex technology of compliance earn its rightful place.
Spending money on fifty integrations just because they look great in a comparison table is not a good idea. They should be paid for only when you realize that the cost of the job they replace by hand is greater.